Teaching Romanticism


Teaching Romanticism should be a joy, because it should be about joy, which means that when it’s not a joy, the sense of desolation is palpable.

But look – there on my page – is Romanticism as a teaching specialism.


These days, too many teachable authors are selected on the basis of what will make for a marketable module descriptor.  How else to explain the fact that Frankenstein is now regarded as a masterpiece of Romantic Literature when it’s not even Mary Shelley’s best novel?  The fact is that Frankenstein is easy to sell and sell quickly.  Students feel they know in advance what they’d be getting when they plump for Frankenstein.

Nobody knows what’s in store for them when they start reading Wordsworth’s Prelude.

Wordsworth cannot be reduced to a module descriptor – indeed the whole point of Wordsworth is the kind of infinite yearning and deferral of…

View original post 329 more words


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: